Instead of working for American citizens who voted those in office it seems that elected democratics would rather die on a hill called Trump. In all of their saber rattling they are constantly coming up on the wrong side of right as they side against President Trump’s deep dive into the politicization of government and the gross mishandling of the American treasury. It is the expectation of responsible governance that American have never seen out in the open for a very long time as we are seeing being revealed in just one agency – The USAID.
In 2016 Trump promised to drain the swamp. Most Americans didn’t even know there was a swamp until the resistance surfaced in great opposition resulting in one impeachment shortly after taking office and a second after leaving office and then there was J6, 2021.
I have always contended that these events were somehow connected. Just recently and during the DOGE inquiry into “where the money went” a lot has begun to surface. Billions of American taxpayer funds have been misused to promote agendas that are in many cases used for regime change in third world nations AND here in the USA.
It has very recently been revealed that domestic terrorists flown in to Minneapolis to initiate rioting, looting and caused the deaths of local citizens after the George Floyd “incident” were indeed organized and funded by USAID. How many of those participants were hunted down, arrested, charged or convicted?
Now fast forward to J6, 2021 when an unknown number of “protestors” were brought in to integrate President Trump’s MAGA crowd into the Capitol Building in D.C. where violence, assaults and terror was unleashed upon members of Congress and Capital Police and other law enforcement officers in order to disrupt the final step in the election process while casting complete blame on President Trump and his supporters. What happened next was utterly unheard of in American – the hunting down (by any means necessary) all who were seen or admitted being in D.C. on J6 over a 4 year period, where many were imprisoned, charged and uncharged, cohered and “sentenced” while those “agents” of the FBI remained unscathed. I’m sure that in due time it will surface how USAID was involved using the same tactics and funds as in Minneapolis.
It is no secret that President Trump acting with the authority and power afforded him by the US Constitution is aiming for a full audit of governmental expenditures with the aim to stop the financial mismanagement as well as paring down the bloated size of government which has been feebly attempted by presidents before him, yet this time it is with Trump’s fine tooth comb of efficiency.
Ask your elected officials why they support this gigantic effort? If not, “WHY NOT”?
If you or someone you know is affected by this shrinking of government consider the cost of massive and widespread fraud, waste and abuse which has infused itself in virtually every sector of government.
Remember the words of Ronald Reagan who said the most dreaded words uttered, “I’m from the government and I’m here to help”.
To those congressional democrats who verbally assaulted the security guard at the Department of Education when he refused them entry, you work for us, not the other way around. DOGE may be coming after you next.
Everyone knows that DOGE must be a scam because there are two D’s in Dodge and neither stands for Democrats. Besides calling names (same ones different faces) and demanding this unelected person (Elon Musk) get out of Dodge (DOGE) and while attempting unsuccessfully to gain unauthorized access to the Department of Education it would appear that Congressional Democrats are trying to get Trump’s government buyout for themselves because either they are unable or unwilling to do the job their constituents elected them to do.
I’ve never seen such a motley crew as those homesteaders in the House of Representatives as they attempt to disrupt President Trump’s governmental audit of where the fraud, waste and abuse is running wild. Wait until Team DOGE gets over to audit the Legislative Branch?
“Mad Max” as she is affectionately known is in for a rude awakening after shouting to the rooftops that Elon Musk is not an elected official, when it is apparent that as an elected official Maxine Waters and her “posse” have failed their primary duties, especially when it comes to “Congressional Oversight” of every government agency. They are vocal about what Trump can and cannot do, that they have forgotten the fact that Trump is the only one elected to be the 47th President. How many American taxpayers are okay with the government wasted spending that is coming out from DOGE? I am not okay with what I see and hear.
The funny thing about Trump’s worker buyout is that in order to get rid of the waste, some very good workers will see the monetary enticement as a way to get free money for 7 months, and then wake up to discover they outed themselves and are unable to get back in to that cushy government job.
The next wave of government hires will be looked at collectively, across the board and individually for professionalism, patriotism and love of country as well as technical expertise.
And we’re only 3 weeks into Trump’s lame duck term. (How lame is that?) – RTM
Almost every time someone challenges rational thinking there are many who expose themselves by very publicly voicing their opposition. I’m sure that when the first caveman rolled a stone down a hill there were critics who came out and said he wasn’t doing it correctly.
The advancement of civilization didn’t come by sitting around debating and yet it took the Chinese to reveal that a journey begins with that first step.
American politics is where people are reminded of their historical failures and the reasoning to remain where they are until the government, like a knight on a white horse, comes to rescue them. Didn’t Ronald Reagan say the most dreaded words uttered by man were, “I’m from the government and I’m here to help”?
There is much consternation and opposition to President Trump’s dive into the deep dark state of financial mismanagement throughout various government agencies. Trump’s creation of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) should be welcomed by democrats and republicans across the political isle since it consists of a very smart team of volunteers who are experts in rooting out financial mismanagement and have been given specific marching orders from President Trump and have a very defined short timeframe (January 20, 2025 – July 4, 2026) to get it done.
The very first targeted area was the USAID headquarters in Washington, D.C. where they were met with opposition by USAID’s upper management and proceeded to place this agency on administrative leave pending their investigation of financial mismanagement. DOGE is operating under the direct supervision and control of President Trump and at his orders to conduct a thorough investigation of EVERY government agency and report their findings back to him. The outcry of congressional democrats is confirmation that this was and is the right move, after all who isn’t concerned with how taxpayer dollars are spent and accounted for? Not one taxpayer dollar is obligated to be sent to anyone or any country simply because they ask for it. USAID should begin here at home, providing financial aid and assistance to Americans in times of natural and/or manmade disasters such as floods, hurricanes and wildfires.
Until members of congress become less concerned about raising taxes and more concerned about frugal spending in American interests like (health, welfare and national security) they are not serving the American people, but their own selfish interests.
President Trump’s campaign promise of shrinking the size and scope of government is necessary in order to get back to government’s primary responsibility of taking care of American citizens and future probes into government agencies such as the Department of Education, the Internal Revenue Service, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and every other government agency are certainly warranted.
The idea of “Federal Worker Buyouts” is a brilliant idea to help shrink this bloated and oversized government, where workers can retire, resign or get fired will ultimately sift out the chaff.
My only concern is whether voters will do the same at the ballot box for nonperforming and/or underperforming members of congress, in particular those democrats who are raising a political stunt in the streets because they say Elon Musk received no votes to do what he is doing. Well guess what President Trump WAS ELECTED TO GET THINGS DONE, and Elon Musk and his DOGE team is doing what they were handpicked to do? – RTM
The biggest question asked by the Democratic Party is how is it that Kamala Harris lost the 2024 election? It appears that since the November 5th presidential election Democrats have been working overtime trying to affix the blame on somebody.
The first excuse was that Kamala didn’t have enough time or that she couldn’t separate herself from Biden.
And then there’s the money that left her campaign seriously in debt for $1B. Money spent on bad wine, bad women and really bad songs all intended to use currently popular rap and rock stars to promote her message of going to be the president of all the people (except Trump supporters).
I’ve heard that she’s a really good candidate and a serious contender who could have beat Trump had all things been equal. I mean she was an attorney, a skilled prosecutor and a fierce attorney general, right? She had risen to become a US Senator representing California and became President Joe Biden’s Vice President that beat President Trump in 2020, right?
It was even suggested that her educational history and her entire professional career could have very well been based on affirmative actions, the precursor to D.E.I. or some other performance based hiring criteria.
Regardless of the motives or path forward it would appear that she was highly qualified to become the first female president, yet something went wrong and the Democratic Party has yet to figure it out. At a recent Democratic Party meeting to choose a new DNC leadership team attendees were asked for a show of hands at whether racism and misogyny were to blame for Kamala Harris’ loss? Virtually everyone agreed and they patted themselves on their collective backs for being so smart.
Well Democrats here’s a news flash for you. It is my opinion Kamala Harris lost the election not because she couldn’t communicate her message to her voters, or that she had no message going forward, or the fact that she refused to place herself out there in no holds barred interviews or open town hall meetings across the nation, or not even her incessant attacks that Trump was Hitler.
No, none of that mattered.
The single most reason Kamala Harris lost the election was due to incompetence. She assumed she had the support of Americans although she didn’t prepare or put forth her vision of security and prosperity for America. Like the Democratic Party, Kamala Harris took for granted the voters she thought she owned and showed nothing about what would be different under her presidency. “Not looking back and looking ahead” is not a viable solution to the economy, national security or international affairs and does absolutely nothing toward uniting Americans toward a common cause or goal.
Does the Democratic Party bear any responsibility for Harris’ loss? Yes, they do! It was the DNC who put all their eggs in one basket, the Biden basket and once they had been found out, they scrambled all those eggs when they dropped the President of the United States and tried to serve an unsavory dish in the Vice President who has done absolutely nothing to earn the trust or support of democratic voters. So keep your non-binary garbage to yourselves and stop trying to peddle that stuff in the public forum. – RTM
New World Order The 2030 Agenda For Sustainable Development
You may be wondering where did this DEI, Green New Deal and Mass Migration all come from and I have been wondering the same thing.
For the past soon to be 250 years of our nation’s history we have been that shining light upon a hill that President Reagan spoke about. It’s nothing new that people from across the globe has sought to come here for a better life, to live the American dream and to live in the freedoms enshrined in the US Constitution.
What is also true is that nefarious individuals have also sought to come here for completely different reasons. New York is one of the early settlements in our nation’s history. Today we see it as home to a host of international business headquarters, corporations and even international organizations such as the headquarters for the United Nations.
It’s no wonder that with all the representatives of every major nation of the world and world powers that ideas propagated elsewhere have crept into our society and are threatening to seriously alter, affect or attempt to change the rule of law in America from the US Constitution to that of a new world order going back to 1992 at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil when more than 178 countries adopted Agenda 21.
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by all United Nations Member States in 2015, provides a shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, now and into the future. At its heart are the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which are an urgent call for action by all countries – developed and developing – in a global partnership. They recognize that ending poverty and other deprivations must go hand-in-hand with strategies that improve health and education, reduce inequality, and spur economic growth – all while tackling climate change and working to preserve our oceans and forests.
In June 1992, at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, more than 178 countries adopted Agenda 21, a comprehensive plan of action to build a global partnership for sustainable development to improve human lives and protect the environment.
Member States unanimously adopted the Millennium Declaration at the Millennium Summit in September 2000 at UN Headquarters in New York. The Summit led to the elaboration of eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to reduce extreme poverty by 2015.
The Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development and the Plan of Implementation, adopted at the World Summit on Sustainable Development in South Africa in 2002, reaffirmed the global community’s commitments to poverty eradication and the environment, and built on Agenda 21 and the Millennium Declaration by including more emphasis on multilateral partnerships.
At the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in June 2012, Member States adopted the outcome document “The Future We Want” in which they decided, inter alia, to launch a process to develop a set of SDGs to build upon the MDGs and to establish the UN High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development. The Rio +20 outcome also contained other measures for implementing sustainable development, including mandates for future programmes of work in development financing, small island developing states and more.
In 2013, the General Assembly set up a 30-member Open Working Group to develop a proposal on the SDGs.
Every year, the UN Secretary General presents an annual SDG Progress report, which is developed in cooperation with the UN System, and based on the global indicator framework and data produced by national statistical systems and information collected at the regional level.
Please, check below information about the SDG Progress Report:
Additionally, the Global Sustainable Development Report is produced once every four years to inform the quadrennial SDG review deliberations at the General Assembly. It is written by an Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the Secretary-General.
If that doesn’t send a chill down your spine as it did mine then in the very near future you may wake up to find armed soldiers of the “United Nations” patrolling in your neighborhood, enforcing international laws that not only conflict, but supersede the US Constitution and render the rights and privileges of US Citizens null and void. – RTM
NY (D) Hakeem Jeffries since 2013 has vowed publicly that Democrats will resist President Trump’s agenda, “We’re gonna fight it in the courts and we’re gonna fight it in the streets”. It is irresponsible talking points can lead to inciting riots, when taken seriously. It is obvious by his speech that neither he nor the Democratic Party for that matter have listened to their constituents or learned from their past political mistakes.
MA (D) John Fetterman since 2023 has made it clear that “Democrats can’t get wrapped up in “freaking out” over every controversial move Trump makes, adding that has proven to be a losing formula for the party and its brand.”
It’s obvious that change must come from within the Democratic Party or it will continue to embrace the policies and ideas that have proven to exclude working class Americans and drive them into the arms of Trump Republicans.
For the past sixteen years Americans have been under mostly Democratic Party control in the House, and or Senate or in the Executive Branch. So much so that attacking adversity or differing ideas has become a spiteful cancer in our society that pits family against family, neighbor against neighbor and more broadly Americans against Americans by race, ethnicity, sexually, and politically and finally pitting the government against the citizens it is designed to protect.
The past four leaderless years in American politics have proven that a ship without a rudder, like a captain asleep at the helm simply drifts aimlessly with the tide.
Patriotism has become a crime in America.
Standing up for the rights guaranteed under the Constitution is seen by some as anarchy and the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is trumped by abortion. We must stop the hurtful rhetoric of demeaning each other and focus on our future ahead. When tragedy strikes we must put our differences aside and join together for a cause bigger than ourselves.
Republicans are not immune either. We all share in the responsibility for taking care of each other regardless of political affiliation.
America has a purpose, a light on a hill for the world to see and we must not hinder the light.
President Trump calls the days ahead “America’s Golden Years” as he paves the way to prosperity for all but we must not forget that we place our trust not in man but in God alone.
Psalms 23
The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want.
2 He makes me to lie down in green pastures: he leads me beside the still waters.
3 He restores my soul: he leads me in the paths of righteousness for his name’s sake.
4 Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.
5 Thou prepares a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: thou anoints my head with oil; my cup runs over.
6 Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life: and I will dwell in the house of the Lord for ever
How quickly we forget that our God, the God of Jacob, Isaak, and Abraham, the God of David, and Moses whose name is “I AM” has the entire world in the palm of HIS hands. Jesus told us that in this world there will be sorrow and troubles, wars and rumors of wars but to fear not because HE is with us and will never leave us or forsake us. – RTM
9When they heard this, they began to go away one by one, beginning with the older ones, until only Jesus was left, with the woman standing there.
10Then Jesus straightened up and asked her, “Woman, where are your accusers? Has no one condemned you?”
11“No one, Lord,” she answered. “Then neither do I condemn you,” Jesus declared. “Now go and sin no more.”
It seems ludicrous to me that U.S. Senators feel it is their duty to demean President Trump to his cabinet nominees and brow beat them in an attempt to make them feel responsible for the actions of the president. Especially when one senator misled about his military service, another misled about her Indian ancestry and another is or has been a card carrying member of a “White’s Only” beach club in Rhode Island, while other members of congress belong to the Congressional Black Caucus (blacks only) which is funded by US tax dollars and one senator actively prosecuted President Trump on two impeachment charges as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives.
Common Sense dictates that people who live in glass houses should not throw rocks. – RTM
Some things just get stuck in my mind, like when Americans were stunned over the 2016 election, where Democratic favorite Secretary Hillary Clinton lost her bid to political unknown real estate developer and entertainer Donald Trump.
An investigative journalistic report “Collusion – Obama, Biden Oval Office Meeting on January 5 Was Key To Entire Anti-Trump Operation” by Mollie Hemmingway published in the Federalist and dated May 5th, 2020 exposed a January 5th, 2017 meeting in the Oval Office between President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, National Security Advisor Susan Rice, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, FBI Director Andrew Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. The meeting was to protect Obama’s administration’s utilization of secretly funded Clinton campaign research, which alleged Trump was involved in a treasonous plot to collude with Russia, from being discovered or stopped by the incoming administration.
Steps were taken to leak to the press selected information on a supposed Russia Trump conspiracy, ambush incoming National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and get him fired before he found out and took action, and to get the incoming Attorney General Jeff Sessions to recuse himself from oversight of investigations of President Trump. Explosive media leaks were a key strategy in the operation to take down Trump. When Comey was fired on May 9, he orchestrated the launch of a Special Counsel probe that continued for another 2 years that ended with Mueller finding no evidence of Trump or anyone connected to him.
After the Electoral College certification process on January 6th, 2017 there was that congratulatory meeting between President Obama and President-Elect Trump televised live. It was a one president to another soon to join the “club” moment where smiling at the cameras hid a dark secret just waiting to come out.
The Mollie Hemmingway investigative report detailed the activities of Obama holdovers at the FBI through March 2, 2017 who were intent in getting Trump thrown out of office.
“This stunning operation was not just a typical battle between political foes, nor merely an example of media bias against political enemies. Instead, this entire operation was a deliberate and direct attack on the foundation of American governance. In light of the newly declassified documents released in recent days, it is clear that understanding what happened in that January 5 Oval Office meeting is essential to understanding the full scope and breadth of the corrupt operation against the Trump administration. It is long past time for lawmakers in Congress who are actually interested in oversight of the federal government and the media to demand answers about what really happened in that meeting from every single participant, including Obama and Biden.”
There were a great number of media personalities who were used to feed this anti-Trump sentiment that has become entrenched into the main stream Legacy media (printed, online and on air) that have poisoned the minds of many Americans and really calls for both a congressional and DOJ investigation to uncover the truth and to hold these individuals fully accountable. – RTM
What are the rights of non-citizen aliens under the U.S. Constitution?
Short answer – NONE!
Many are asking, why is President Trump’s Homeland Security team going after migrants whose only crime was to enter the United States illegally? Is it fair that Trump promised to target illegal aliens who are violent criminals and vowing to remove them first, but is subsequently scooping up other non-violent illegal aliens?
Those hard questions require hard answers. So you might be wondering what U.S. Code determines who is a deportable alien – here is your answer:
(1) Inadmissible at time of entry or of adjustment of status or violates status
(A) Inadmissible aliens
Any alien who at the time of entry or adjustment of status was within one or more of the classes of aliens inadmissible by the law existing at such time is deportable.
(C) Violated nonimmigrant status or condition of entry
(i) Nonimmigrant status violators
Any alien who was admitted as a nonimmigrant and who has failed to maintain the nonimmigrant status in which the alien was admitted or to which it was changed under section 1258 of this title, or to comply with the conditions of any such status, is deportable.
(ii) Violators of conditions of entry
Any alien whom the Secretary of Health and Human Services certifies has failed to comply with terms, conditions, and controls that were imposed under section 1182(g) of this title is deportable.
(D) Termination of conditional permanent residence
(i) In general
Any alien with permanent resident status on a conditional basis under section 1186a of this title (relating to conditional permanent resident status for certain alien spouses and sons and daughters) or under section 1186b of this title (relating to conditional permanent resident status for certain alien entrepreneurs, spouses, and children) who has had such status terminated under such respective section is deportable.
Any alien who (prior to the date of entry, at the time of any entry, or within 5 years of the date of any entry) knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law is deportable.
(ii) Special rule in the case of family reunification
Clause (i) shall not apply in the case of alien who is an eligible immigrant (as defined in section 301(b)(1) of the Immigration Act of 1990), was physically present in the United States on May 5, 1988, and is seeking admission as an immediate relative or under section 1153(a)(2) of this title (including under section 112 of the Immigration Act of 1990) or benefits under section 301(a) of the Immigration Act of 1990 if the alien, before May 5, 1988, has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided only the alien’s spouse, parent, son, or daughter (and no other individual) to enter the United States in violation of law.
(iii) Waiver authorized
The Attorney General may, in his discretion for humanitarian purposes, to assure family unity, or when it is otherwise in the public interest, waive application of clause (i) in the case of any alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence if the alien has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided only an individual who at the time of the offense was the alien’s spouse, parent, son, or daughter (and no other individual) to enter the United States in violation of law.
(G) Marriage fraud, An alien shall be considered to be deportable as having procured a visa or other documentation by fraud (within the meaning of section 1182(a)(6)(C)(i) of this title) and to be in the United States in violation of this chapter (within the meaning of subparagraph (B)) if—
(i) the alien obtains any admission into the United States with an immigrant visa or other documentation procured on the basis of a marriage entered into less than 2 years prior to such admission of the alien and which, within 2 years subsequent to any admission of the alien in the United States, shall be judicially annulled or terminated, unless the alien establishes to the satisfaction of the Attorney General that such marriage was not contracted for the purpose of evading any provisions of the immigration laws, or
(ii)
it appears to the satisfaction of the Attorney General that the alien has failed or refused to fulfill the alien’s marital agreement which in the opinion of the Attorney General was made for the purpose of procuring the alien’s admission as an immigrant.
(H) Waiver authorized for certain misrepresentationsThe provisions of this paragraph relating to the removal of aliens within the United States on the ground that they were inadmissible at the time of admission as aliens described in section 1182(a)(6)(C)(i) of this title, whether willful or innocent, may, in the discretion of the Attorney General, be waived for any alien (other than an alien described in paragraph (4)(D)) who—
(II) was in possession of an immigrant visa or equivalent document and was otherwise admissible to the United States at the time of such admission except for those grounds of inadmissibility specified under paragraphs (5)(A) and (7)(A) of section 1182(a) of this title which were a direct result of that fraud or misrepresentation.
A waiver of removal for fraud or misrepresentation granted under this subparagraph shall also operate to waive removal based on the grounds of inadmissibility directly resulting from such fraud or misrepresentation.
(I) is convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude committed within five years (or 10 years in the case of an alien provided lawful permanent resident status under section 1255(j) of this title) after the date of admission, and
(II) is convicted of a crime for which a sentence of one year or longer may be imposed,
is deportable.
(ii) Multiple criminal convictions
Any alien who at any time after admission is convicted of two or more crimes involving moral turpitude, not arising out of a single scheme of criminal misconduct, regardless of whether confined therefor and regardless of whether the convictions were in a single trial, is deportable.
(iii) Aggravated felony
Any alien who is convicted of an aggravated felony at any time after admission is deportable.
(iv) High speed flight
Any alien who is convicted of a violation of section 758 of title 18 (relating to high speed flight from an immigration checkpoint) is deportable.
Clauses (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) shall not apply in the case of an alien with respect to a criminal conviction if the alien subsequent to the criminal conviction has been granted a full and unconditional pardon by the President of the United States or by the Governor of any of the several States.
(B) Controlled substances
(i) Conviction
Any alien who at any time after admission has been convicted of a violation of (or a conspiracy or attempt to violate) any law or regulation of a State, the United States, or a foreign country relating to a controlled substance (as defined in section 802 of title 21), other than a single offense involving possession for one’s own use of 30 grams or less of marijuana, is deportable.
(ii) Drug abusers and addicts
Any alien who is, or at any time after admission has been, a drug abuser or addict is deportable.
(C) Certain firearm offenses
Any alien who at any time after admission is convicted under any law of purchasing, selling, offering for sale, exchanging, using, owning, possessing, or carrying, or of attempting or conspiring to purchase, sell, offer for sale, exchange, use, own, possess, or carry, any weapon, part, or accessory which is a firearm or destructive device (as defined in section 921(a) of title 18) in violation of any law is deportable.
(D) Miscellaneous crimesAny alien who at any time has been convicted (the judgment on such conviction becoming final) of, or has been so convicted of a conspiracy or attempt to violate—
(i) any offense under chapter 37 (relating to espionage), chapter 105 (relating to sabotage), or chapter 115 (relating to treason and sedition) of title 18 for which a term of imprisonment of five or more years may be imposed;
(ii) any offense under section 871 or 960 of title 18;
(iv) a violation of section 1185 or 1328 of this title,
is deportable.
(E) Crimes of domestic violence, stalking, or violation of protection order, crimes against children and
(i) Domestic violence, stalking, and child abuse
Any alien who at any time after admission is convicted of a crime of domestic violence, a crime of stalking, or a crime of child abuse, child neglect, or child abandonment is deportable. For purposes of this clause, the term “crime of domestic violence” means any crime of violence (as defined in section 16 of title 18) against a person committed by a current or former spouse of the person, by an individual with whom the person shares a child in common, by an individual who is cohabiting with or has cohabited with the person as a spouse, by an individual similarly situated to a spouse of the person under the domestic or family violence laws of the jurisdiction where the offense occurs, or by any other individual against a person who is protected from that individual’s acts under the domestic or family violence laws of the United States or any State, Indian tribal government, or unit of local government.
(ii) Violators of protection orders
Any alien who at any time after admission is enjoined under a protection order issued by a court and whom the court determines has engaged in conduct that violates the portion of a protection order that involves protection against credible threats of violence, repeated harassment, or bodily injury to the person or persons for whom the protection order was issued is deportable. For purposes of this clause, the term “protection order” means any injunction issued for the purpose of preventing violent or threatening acts of domestic violence, including temporary or final orders issued by civil or criminal courts (other than support or child custody orders or provisions) whether obtained by filing an independent action or as a pendente lite order in another proceeding.
(3) Failure to register and falsification of documents
(A) Change of address
An alien who has failed to comply with the provisions of section 1305 of this title is deportable, unless the alien establishes to the satisfaction of the Attorney General that such failure was reasonably excusable or was not willful.
(B) Failure to register or falsification of documents
(iii) of a violation of, or an attempt or a conspiracy to violate, section 1546 of title 18 (relating to fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other entry documents),
Any alien who falsely represents, or has falsely represented, himself to be a citizen of the United States for any purpose or benefit under this chapter (including section 1324a of this title) or any Federal or State law is deportable.
(ii) Exception
In the case of an alien making a representation described in clause (i), if each natural parent of the alien (or, in the case of an adopted alien, each adoptive parent of the alien) is or was a citizen (whether by birth or naturalization), the alien permanently resided in the United States prior to attaining the age of 16, and the alien reasonably believed at the time of making such representation that he or she was a citizen, the alien shall not be considered to be deportable under any provision of this subsection based on such representation.
(4) Security and related grounds
(A) In generalAny alien who has engaged, is engaged, or at any time after admission engages in—
(i) any activity to violate any law of the United States relating to espionage or sabotage or to violate or evade any law prohibiting the export from the United States of goods, technology, or sensitive information,
(ii) any other criminal activity which endangers public safety or national security, or
(iii) any activity a purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or overthrow of, the Government of the United States by force, violence, or other unlawful means,
An alien whose presence or activities in the United States the Secretary of State has reasonable ground to believe would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States is deportable.
Any alien who has engaged in the recruitment or use of child soldiers in violation of section 2442 of title 18 is deportable.
(5) Public charge
Any alien who, within five years after the date of entry, has become a public charge from causes not affirmatively shown to have arisen since entry is deportable.
(6) Unlawful voters
(A) In general
Any alien who has voted in violation of any Federal, State, or local constitutional provision, statute, ordinance, or regulation is deportable.
(B) Exception
In the case of an alien who voted in a Federal, State, or local election (including an initiative, recall, or referendum) in violation of a lawful restriction of voting to citizens, if each natural parent of the alien (or, in the case of an adopted alien, each adoptive parent of the alien) is or was a citizen (whether by birth or naturalization), the alien permanently resided in the United States prior to attaining the age of 16, and the alien reasonably believed at the time of such violation that he or she was a citizen, the alien shall not be considered to be deportable under any provision of this subsection based on such violation.
(7) Waiver for victims of domestic violence
(A) In generalThe Attorney General is not limited by the criminal court record and may waive the application of paragraph (2)(E)(i) (with respect to crimes of domestic violence and crimes of stalking) and (ii) in the case of an alien who has been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty and who is not and was not the primary perpetrator of violence in the relationship—
(III) the alien committed, was arrested for, was convicted of, or pled guilty to committing a crime—
(aa) that did not result in serious bodily injury; and
(bb) where there was a connection between the crime and the alien’s having been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty.
(B) Credible evidence considered
In acting on applications under this paragraph, the Attorney General shall consider any credible evidence relevant to the application. The determination of what evidence is credible and the weight to be given that evidence shall be within the sole discretion of the Attorney General.
(b) Deportation of certain nonimmigrants
An alien, admitted as a nonimmigrant under the provisions of either section 1101(a)(15)(A)(i) or 1101(a)(15)(G)(i) of this title, and who fails to maintain a status under either of those provisions, shall not be required to depart from the United States without the approval of the Secretary of State, unless such alien is subject to deportation under paragraph (4) of subsection (a).
(1) If the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that an application for nonimmigrant status under subparagraph (T) or (U) of section 1101(a)(15) of this title filed for an alien in the United States sets forth a prima facie case for approval, the Secretary may grant the alien an administrative stay of a final order of removal under section 1231(c)(2) of this title until—
(A) the application for nonimmigrant status under such subparagraph (T) or (U) is approved; or
(B) there is a final administrative denial of the application for such nonimmigrant status after the exhaustion of administrative appeals.
(2) The denial of a request for an administrative stay of removal under this subsection shall not preclude the alien from applying for a stay of removal, deferred action, or a continuance or abeyance of removal proceedings under any other provision of the immigration laws of the United States.
(3) During any period in which the administrative stay of removal is in effect, the alien shall not be removed.
(4) Nothing in this subsection may be construed to limit the authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General to grant a stay of removal or deportation in any case not described in this subsection.
In 2015 the American political system became acutely aware of a political outsider by the name of Donald J. Trump. He promised to build the wall and drain the swamp. His critics said it couldn’t be done because frankly he would never become president. During the 2016 campaign season Trump critics launched a broad based (pun intended) assault on his character, his professional standing and his family in an effort to discredit him and prevent what happened on January 20, 2017 when Trump became the 45th President of the United States.
During Trump’s first term (2017 – 2021) there were many slanderous attacks, outright assaults on his administration by members of congress, the mainstream media and two presidential impeachments intended to remove him from office during a time when world leaders respected and feared what his wrath could do. By all standards Trump’s successes (COVID Response; Abraham Accords, Relocation of US Embassy to Jerusalem and others) and his official decisions were ignored and his supporters were assaulted and mistreated and following the extremely questionable election of 2020 and the unfortunate events of J6, 2021 (which led to his 2nd Impeachment).
The Joe Biden #46 presidency (2021 – 2025) was a disaster by any normal method of measurement. Americans were bombarded by presidential decrees mandating all sort of nonsense from dealing with the effects of COVID and AOCs Green New Deal to the new EV Mandate. The most egregious of all was the Biden administration’s response to J6 where thousands of citizens were hunted down, imprisoned, tortured and in many cases forced to sign “confessions” for things they never did on J6 and then saddled them with pure bogus federal charges. It is most unfortunate that members of congress on both sides of the isle for the most part resigned themselves to seeing this resistance to Trump as business as usual.
We are 8 days into Trump’s second term started on J20, 2025 and I have to say it’s been a whirlwind of activity from the Oval Office as President #47 Trump began his “Promises made, promises kept” 2nd term by signing more than 300 Executive Orders reversing most of Biden’s EOs, closing the US borders to stop the flow of illegal migrants, human trafficking and drugs, positioning the United States in the world arena as a totally “America First” nation beginning with removing illegal alien criminals and gangs from our nation and returning them back to their country of origin.
American politicians would best be served by taking notice to how once again world leaders respond with respect to this American President and are fearful of what will happen if they continue taking advantage of our American generosity.
This Trump Resistance Movement (TRM) being expressed by members of congress, governors, mayors and politicians at every level will ultimately result in hardships for American citizens who decide that business as usual is better for them, than a safer, healthier and greater, more prosperous America for all. Anyone who chooses coming up against this radically changed government administration should be aware that they may be choosing a 4’ X 6’ room with a toilet and a sink without the freedom they now enjoy.
The Real Truckmaster 