It didn’t start with the election of President Trump, but has been going on for many, many years. Yet what has been uncovered with the mergence of this political outsider, yet well-known to the very politicians who denounce him today, is the hypocrisy of the swamp, and the creatures of the political deep-state.

When did the political gap widen to the point that party “loyalty” is measured by going against a persons God given sense of right and wrong? This is nothing more than political bullying at its very core and encompassing the left and the right.

The political legislative body has lost its moral compass. It seems better to please the bully bosses than to do what is right and appropriate as seen for what it is from the 2018 SOTU Address.

When the peoples representatives openly demonstrate AGAINST American values and find fault with the country, our flag and a president who has more than demonstrated his love for America by his words, his actions and his campaign promises, yet the open rebellion from the liberal left is thought to be the norm? I don’t think so!

What is needed and what we must have is a re-grounding of the American political process. Since when did it become acceptable for congress to call others racist and intolerant while harboring groups like Black Lives Matter, the Congressional Black Caucus and the Muslim Brotherhood?

Our law enforcement and military have been seen by some as the enemy and disrespecting America by so-called “Americans” is thought to be normal? It isn’t!

Our “resistance congress” has much to be ashamed of, and should be held in “Contempt of  Country” for the way they behave. It’s obvious that many were not raised properly and/or lacked role models with integrity.

Lawmakers who failed to act in 2012 when the unlawful DACA order was given by the actual first living undocumented president, have done little to nothing since to right this wrong against America.

In September 2017, President Trump gave notice that congress MUST right this wrong in accordance to the US Constitution, or on 5 March 2018 DACA will end. There are exactly 30 days before that deadline is here, and all the posturing, accusations and inaction of this congress will affect families across this nation, as the law enforcement process will become evident.

American’s should be outraged at a congress that demonstrates their dislike and outright hatred of what this nation stands for.

To quote one of my grandsons, “Winter is Coming”!

I’m for a national recall of any legislator who is unresponsive to the duties of their office. Politicians like Schumer, Pelosi, Feinstein and others who think malfeasance equals resistance. It is not! Come election day they should be replaced by untainted patriots who love this country and it’s laws.  – I am the Real Truckmaster!

realtruckmaster.blog

 

Have you seen someone on TV or read an article that the author says is just constructive criticism? But what you read was an all out, no hands barred attack of that person’s character? What’s the difference if the person being criticized (attacked) is a friend or a family member? Does it change anything? What if it’s a co-worker or maybe a fellow believer in Christ? What does it take to “flip that switch” from friendly or constructive criticism to an all out war with words? Have you ever thought about it? I mean seriously thought about it?

 

While you’re mulling that over, what if I told you that in certain circles there are rules for winning an argument no matter the costs involved?

Rules like PFPP:

P = picking a target

F = freezing it

P = personalize it and

P = polarize it

PFPP = A pretty straight forward rule. It cuts to the chase and goes for the juggler.

When you take that thought into the political realm and apply it to say your political opposition you can create a firestorm. You know you’ve hit a nerve when their supporters come out of the woodwork and line up like pees in a pod. You just zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack. Yes attack, because that’s exactly what it is and attack on that person’s character, their family, their livelihood and all they hold dear.

Politicians have a tendency to shift the blame and move the spotlight away from them to make someone else the target. Once you pick your target, look for their vulnerability. When the target says, “Don’t pick on me, there are others to blame”. You freeze your target and disregard their arguments as you continue to attack. One way to get out of the spotlight is to resign from public office or announce that you are no longer going to run for re-election. This has worked pretty well for the Democratic Party particularly in the last few general elections. Someone throws out an accusation and the person being attacked bails out, often without a parachute. How many politicians have simply disappeared in the past month or so?

That’s why the liberal left is so intent on removing statues (inanimate objects) by focusing on individual statues that have names like “Robert E. Lee” because he was a slave owner (doesn’t matter whether it’s true or not, just because of his name recognition). You have to choose a target that is a personification (personal), not something general or abstract.

The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Don’t let the enemy suddenly agree with your demand and say “You’re right – I don’t know what to do about this issue, why don’t you tell us?”

You have to keep them on the defensive. You have to press on with the attack, at all costs. Remember that power goes to two poles: to those who’ve got money and those who’ve got people.

This strategy has been very effective in keeping the “swamp” full of rats. Rats will scurry around this way and that way looking for dark holes in which to hide, allowing business as usual to continue.

Isn’t it interesting what has happened in American politics since the Reagan era? Republicans have lost in many cases because of some sort of scandal being raised by Democrats? Yet have gone on to commit some serious, in your face “Teflon” scandalous behavior that obtains barely a nod? Followed by another Republican who has to deal with accusation after accusation by some rather unscrupulous politicians on the left?

Look back into the not too distant past as in 2007 Senator Hillary Clinton was upstaged by a virtual unknown Senator Barack Obama to “clinch” (if that’s even the right word) the Democratic nomination.

Who was the opposition, Republican Senator John McCain, yet when the mudslinging began it was a comparison of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama against Governor Sarah Palin? As the attacks began it was all over the place, including her character, her family and specifically her children, yet the families of the Democrats were off limits and nobody questioned them.

The election ended up with people voting for change (for change sake) and the winner, pulled his closest rival into his inner circle and offered her a cabinet position (the closest she would come to returning to the white house).

The same thing happened in 2012 when it was Republican Mitt Romney challenging the incumbent. The attacks began on his religious convictions and when the smoke cleared it was once again Barack Obama in the winner’s circle, how convenient?

Did anybody notice the same rules or tactics being used throughout these elections? (I’ll let you in on a little secret, Hillary and Barack noticed. In fact they both were honing those rules for quite some time). So confident were they that in the 2016 election, they had it in the bag. In fact most of the Republican candidates were known political rivals (cut from the same cloth, so to speak).

Oh there were some in the pack who weren’t beltway insiders. They were corporate CEOs and professionals, but not much of a threat to the Democratic “Queen Bee”. Her campaign was ready to squash them like the little bugs that they were to her.

What nobody counted on was the jokester in the crowd, the man they called “The Donald” a real estate tycoon turned entertainer and the power behind the Trump Empire. What an easy take down, she must have thought. It was easy to employ the rules needed to bring him to his knees, wishing he’d not entered the presidential race.

The campaign was like a game of spades and Hillary had all of them. She had questions in advance of each debate and no way could she lose.  Her crowds were bigger, her appeal greater and her pockets were greased by oh so many rich and powerful “socialites”.

And still there was PFPP, a chance to bring out the big guns of accusations, sexual and collusion with RUSSIA! They would surely do the trick. Yet the aces of spades were the FBI, CIA and the DOJ all seemingly in her hip pocket.

Another rule was to push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counter side; the principle that every positive has its negative.

Yes she was America’s positive and he was the negative. Another thing she did was to keep the pressure on, different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for her purpose. The media was all too quick to accommodate and reinforce her tactics. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself. She could demonize him and his blunt personality would surely become his downfall?

After the election was over, the shock was overpowering and unbelievable as was the backlash of all those who had put all their eggs into Hillary’s basket. The rules and tactics intensified and now all that was left was to get the election delegitimized and she could still move into the white house, or could she? She simply didn’t count on Trump’s reactions being different than other “fallen” politicians before him.

What she was doing was fishing with lures for a fish that goes for live bait. Her Clinton Machine just could not get thru to the master dealmaker. His vision for America didn’t include the underhanded methods which the Democrats used to undermine the US Constitution. More importantly he did not fall for their rumors and innuendos, but for the past year has methodically dismantled the faulty system that was rigged to bring America down, at the same time fighting harder and pressing forward to insure HIS agenda succeeds, for the good of America.

Over the first year of the Trump presidency there have been many flash points, each easy to distinguish as just another tactic which is simply full of hot air. It’s hard to argue against the fact that Donald Trump is a rude and crude individual. His mannerisms and sometimes his language are sometimes beneath the Office of the Presidency according to some individuals. His methods are certainly unorthodox and who ever heard of a “presidential fireside tweet”? Yet he is highly effective in getting his message out to fellow countrymen. And the world knows straight out what he stands for – America First. They know that he says what he thinks and means what he says, so don’t be too quick to take the word of someone who has declared their hatred for the president when they say “he said”!

There’s a 99.9% chance that someone is not telling the truth. Facing those odds my money is on “The Donald”! – I am the real truckmaster

realtruckmaster.blog

 

Here we go again – “Trump said” and everybody reacts. Let me put this up front, I am not here to make you feel good or feel bad or to debate your opposing views. The matter at hand is not grey, black or white, it’s getting real with America.

 

I simply don’t like it when I see those on the liberal left “stacking the deck” to the detriment of President Donald J. Trump without reason.

 

So according to a friend when it comes to “Immigration, Trump’s latest alleged comments, current postings by those who don’t support him and his agenda……in your eyes, Mr. Trump can do no wrong, it seems.“

 

Well contrary to what you may think, Trump is not perfect.

(There I said it, take it to the bank; print the headlines)!

 

Trump definitely has his flaws. Which liberals on the left are only too quick to point out on an hour by hour, day by day basis, as they have for the past 2 years or longer?

 

What I take issue with is when people make a habit of saying that Trump said something outrageous without even saying “Trump allegedly said”, and everybody goes nuts.

 

What I read, then heard about what was said in the so called private meeting (what’s so private now) did not make me happy. Like many of you at home and around the world I was upset.

 

Here is what the White House officially released:

 

What exactly DID the President say in the private meeting?  The White House issued this statement:

 

“Certain Washington politicians choose to fight for foreign countries, but President Trump will always fight for the American people. The President will only accept an immigration deal that adequately addresses the visa lottery system and chain migration – two programs that hurt our economy and allow terrorists into our country. Like other nations that have merit-based immigration, President Trump is fighting for permanent solutions that make our country stronger by welcoming those who can contribute to our society, grow our economy and assimilate into our great nation. He will always reject temporary, weak and dangerous stopgap measures that threaten the lives of hardworking Americans, and undercut immigrants who seek a better life in the United States through a legal pathway.”

 

I doubt that those shouting from the rooftops took the time to wait for a response from President Trump?

 

It didn’t take long for the president to put out his own tweets about what he did or did not say.

 

“The language used by me at the DACA meeting was tough, but this was not the language used. What was really tough was the outlandish proposal made – a big setback for DACA!”

 

“Never said anything derogatory about Haitians other than Haiti is, obviously, a very poor and troubled country. Never said “take them out.” Made up by the Dems. I have a wonderful relationship with Haitians. Probably should record future meetings – unfortunately, no trust!”

 

 

I have questioned the integrity of any politician who goes into political office and decides to make personal political gains at the expense of others, no matter what political party they aspire to belong. It is easy to see how this meeting quite possibly went down.

 

In the meeting there were politicians present who support President Trumps concerns on the DACA program and who came to the table to make a difference. Also present were politicians who thought they could force their version on the president. When they didn’t get what they wanted, an old Saul Alinsky tactic was used to divert public attention away from their own despicable actions by just throwing something outrageous out there, whether it’s true or not. That tactic has often worked to distract, and draw outrage over a “non-event”. We use to call that “Making a mountain out of a mole hill.”

 

I’m not falling for it.

 

It really goes to the credibility of the democratic senator involved. He purposefully “leaked” false information so as to derail the DACA negotiations, bringing his morals to be in question.

 

Anyone who cares to look back at recent events can see the same tactics have been used over and over in an attempt to divert President Trump from his agenda. Failing that another tactic of “resistance” has been and is being used to impede the current administration from going forth with the president’s agenda.

 

This same tactic was tried just a day or so earlier to bring false allegations of sexual misconduct against the president. (It worked on flaky congressmen who fled like the swamp rats they were, and because they were guilty of wrongdoing.) It worked to prevent an opponent from being elected to political office and the public outrage was too overwhelming, and when falsely accused it wouldn’t surprise me if legal suit is not soon forthcoming.

 

I was born at night, but not last night.

 

These politicians have a habit of using “Politicspeak” when talking to the American people. They utter absolute nonsense and by the time they’re done it seems almost believable. (Almost being the operative word).

 

Trump uses something called “Trumpspeak” which is straight out, in your face and often crude, or more importantly not the way a proper politician talks. Whether it’s over the phone, online thru Twitter, or at a news conference, or in the privacy of a football game, the president shows up in the news over something someone thinks he said, done or implied by doing.

 

This past year on a confidential phone call consoling family members of soldiers killed in the service of OUR country, it was a democratic politician looking for headlines who “leaked” a false narrative of what the president said. Has she been held accountable for her despicable actions?

 

When college football players turned thieves in China while representing the USA, it was the president who secured their release from jail and arranged their return to America. Trump tweeted that he wondered if they would be grateful for his intervening. The media went nuts over Trumps comment, but said nothing when one of the parents in China at the time said it was no big deal and the offenders were later “made” to apologize by their college faculty. Their misconduct became just a “non-story” and disappeared.

 

The president made a disparaging comment about NFL players disrespecting the flag before football games and now disrespect is the new norm. Players are either kept in the locker room or under the stadium so as not to draw attention to their disrespect, another new norm. The networks say they will now cover the kneeling protests live, another new norm.

 

More recently when the president stands for the national anthem at a football game, the pundits are quick to mock him on late night talk shows and on major network news, still another new norm.

 

All of this after 8 years of Barack Obama giving voice in the white house to BLM activists, calling out law enforcement, directing DOJ to ignore federal immigration laws and going so far as to issue an executive order protecting immigrants without documents, without pushing congress to enact or change the immigration laws as per the constitution. This unlawful order has affected 3M + immigrants and congress did nothing about it since 2012.

 

But let Donald Trump tell congress UNLESS they correct this situation the DACA program will end shortly. Now congress is fighting President Trump over the unlawful DACA act?

 

Look at the events of the past year, when Trump speaks to people in private or in confidence it shows up in the headlines?

 

Coincidence, I don’t think so.

 

It may come down to the point where Trump may have to have all of his interactions with others recorded (or maybe just get the tape from the CIA who seem to do it anyway)?

 

 

If I get frustrated with all the negativity and I’m sure the president is frustrated, yet he remains focused on doing what he said he was going to do in spite of the tantrums of the liberal left.

 

So you can stay out of it or you can take a critical look at what’s going on and make up your mind, as I have. I will not just sit idly by as you trash our president, our country, our flag, or our constitution!

 

I took the Oath!  – I am the Real Truckmaster!

 

realtruckmaster.blog